Skip to main content

News & Updates

Directors and Officers of Distressed Businesses – Beware!


February 4, 2021

Read Time

4 minutes


Authors: Sean Williams, Lisa Vandesteeg, and Harold Israel

While businesses nationwide continue to struggle through the ongoing pandemic, corporate directors and officers must be increasingly aware of their company’s financial viability and their own legal duties and obligations. Generally, corporate directors and officers owe a fiduciary duty to the company and its stockholders. However, when a company experiences financial distress and is insolvent, that fiduciary duty shifts to the company’s creditors. If creditors cannot be repaid in full by the company, those creditors may be incentivized to investigate potential causes of action against and recoveries from officers and directors.   

The primary fiduciary duties of directors and officers are:

  • Duty of Care: Directors and officers are expected to refrain from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, intentional misconduct, or knowing violation of the law; and
  • Duty of Loyalty: Directors and officers are expected to act fairly when dealing with the company and to refrain from directly competing with the company.

Directors and officers, however, are presumed to have made informed business decisions, in good faith, and with the belief that actions taken are in the best interest of the company. This presumption is known as the “business judgment rule.” A creditor will have to provide evidence to the contrary in order to prevail in any action alleging that a director violated this Duty of Care. Directors and officers of distressed businesses should make sure to implement best practices and policies to provide evidence that their actions were fair and reasonable, such as:

  • Ensuring that regular board meetings are being held and documented, showing that the board was adequately informed of and monitoring the company’s actions;
  • Retaining independent counsel in order to ensure that the board is fully represented and informed prior to making decisions;
  • Engaging outside experts to “vet” or evaluate any potential actions contemplated by the company;
  • Not acting passively and/or abdicating decision-making responsibilities with respect to the company; and
  • Undertaking, in the context of leveraged buyouts a reasonable investigation into the company’s post‑sale solvency and the propriety and effect of any contemplated post-closing transactions that could be considered part of the same overall transaction when such transactions may affect the post-sale solvency of the company.

The last element results from the recent In re Nine West LBO Securities 1 decision, made in the context of a motion to dismiss, applying Pennsylvania law to particularly egregious facts. It remains to be seen whether other courts will reach a similar conclusion.

Officers should also take note of the Nine West decision as the court found that an officer’s duty may be more limited than that of a director when it ruled that officers do not “owe fiduciary duties to a corporation regarding aspects of the management that are not within their responsibility or are within the exclusive province of the board,” but “may be held liable for breach of fiduciary duty to the extent that they have discretionary authority over, and the power to prevent, the complained of transactions, in which case they will be held to the same standards as a director.” In re Nine W. LBO Sec. Litig., No. 20 MD. 2941 (JSR), 2020 WL 7090277, at *15 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2020).

The Duty of Loyalty, on the other hand, prohibits directors and officers from enhancing their own personal interests at the expense of the corporate interests. There a number of actions that directors and officers can and should take in order to demonstrate that they are not violating (or even have the appearance of violating) the Duty of Loyalty with respect to any company transaction, such as:

  • Disclosing any potential connections or personal gain to all interested parties;
  • Appointing a disinterested, independent committee to recommend a course of action where there are certain directors or officers that may receive personal gain from a certain transaction; and
  • Seeking and following the opinions of experts, or otherwise having a very good, articulated reason for not following expert advice.

Desperate creditors may still seek to obtain a recovery from even the best-intentioned directors and officers of an insolvent company. By taking some of these simple precautions, directors and officers can minimize the likelihood of being sued or being found liable for a breach of fiduciary duty.


1   In re Nine W. LBO Sec. Litig., No. 20 MD. 2941 (JSR), 2020 WL 7090277 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2020).

Filed under: Financial Services & Restructuring

May 04, 2022

Five Things Every Business Leader Should do to Protect Themselves from a Cyberattack

Read More

May 04, 2022

Involuntary Bankruptcy Might Not Be the Right Tool for Aggrieved Creditors—What to Consider Before Taking Action

Read More